Back to Opinion

URBAN JOURNAL: Cuomo's jobs vision - casinos and conventions

Recommend Article
Total Recommendations (0)

Oh, me.

With the national news media hinting at bankruptcy for Kodak, it's a somber time here. So I was hoping our full-speed-ahead governor would announce something big in his State of the State address last week. I was hoping he had exciting ideas for popping up the state's economy - maybe even something for us up here in the Forgotten City by the Lake.

But no. There wasn't much to shout about in the Cuomo vision for growing the economy. He wants to repair the state's infrastructure - replace the Tappan Zee Bridge, fix other some bridges, fix the roads.... All of these need to be done, but they're short-term job boosters. They'll provide construction jobs for awhile, but then they'll go away.

Nor is there a big pot of money sitting in Albany to pay for all this. The governor envisions public-private partnerships to fund the projects. Money from union pension funds, for example, would help pay for the Tappan Zee project. According to Gannett reporter Joe Spector, a Cuomo official says that in the partnerships, "investors would gain equity in a state asset, but not ownership."

So... what? Union names and corporate logos will start adorning highways and bridges and parks around the state?

Cuomo did offer ideas for longer-lasting job growth, but here, too, I'm holding my head in pain. He wants to build a new convention center in Queens. He promises that it'll be the biggest convention center in the nation.

Coincidentally, just a few days before Cuomo gave his speech, the Wall Street Journal published a fascinating op-ed piece headlined "Have We Got a Convention Center to Sell You!" (You have to subscribe to the Journal to read the article, but you can read a similar version on the City Journal quarterly's website.)

The gist of the article: This is risky business indeed.

There's an enormous glut of convention centers in the US, dating back to before the recession, said the Journal piece. And it keeps getting worse. While the number of convention-goers has dropped precipitously, cities have been expanding their convention centers and building new ones.

Chicago enlarged its McCormick Center - which is now operating at 55 percent capacity. The State of Massachusetts funded a new center in Boston that opened in 2004, with officials promising a healthy increase in the number of visitors and a big increase in hotel occupancy. Neither happened, so now the state wants to double the size of the center.

"The whole thing is a racket": That's the Journal article's quote from Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby.

And it made me a little twitchy to read in a Times article last week that the big convention center in Queens will be "a joint venture with a subsidiary of the gambling company Genting Group."

Casinos themselves are another of Cuomo's proposed jobs boosters. He wants gambling allowed at locations other than Indian reservations. Yes, casinos could create new jobs (which Cuomo says will pay well). But casino complexes often include restaurants and hotel rooms, which compete with nearby restaurants and hotels. Job losses at the older businesses can offset the new ones at the casinos.

It's just discouraging. And maybe I'm naïve, but when I think about improving the state's economy - really improving the economy - I don't think about opening casinos and building a big convention center. (I don't think about repairing roads and bridges, either. That's simple household maintenance.)

When I think about improving the state's economy - really improving the economy - I think about medical research, high-tech businesses, science, manufacturing. If we really want to boost the economy of New York State, we ought to be investing in education, in research and development.

To be fair, Cuomo didn't completely ignore those things in State of the State. He promised a second round of regional economic development awards, some of which, presumably, will go to projects with long-term potential.

But Cuomo's own vision is of casinos and the biggest convention center in the nation. And that's a small vision indeed.

Comments for "URBAN JOURNAL: Cuomo's jobs vision - casinos and conventions" (3)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.

User Photo

clint said on Jan. 14, 2012 at 7:26am

MAT,
Worse, 1 billion for Buffalo, nothing for Rochester! He could have given 900 million to Buffalo and 100 million to the Midtown Project and gone a long way towards fixing our downtown as well. By not doing so, he sent a message to us that we do not matter. And, he sent a message to the Mayor and delegation that they are ineffective!

User Photo

bsarbane said on Jan. 26, 2012 at 6:41am

Actually Mary Anna, you are niave and clearly clueless as to how politics work, which is why you spend your time working on a myopic left-wing fantasy rag. The governor is trying to run a value for money state--not something most liberals appreciate, I know--but he doesn't need liberals, only the people of the state. His approval rating is the highest of any governor and he, being a responsible Democrat, knows about value for money. Perhaps you ought to lean in and listen carefully to him, because he'll be our next President while you'll still be writing vanity pieces for the Rolling Stoners in the nursing home.

User Photo

Animule said on Jan. 28, 2012 at 11:08pm

"Chicago enlarged its McCormick Center - which is now operating at 55 percent capacity. The State of Massachusetts funded a new center in Boston that opened in 2004, with officials promising a healthy increase in the number of visitors and a big increase in hotel occupancy. Neither happened, so now the state wants to double the size of the center."

This is exactly correct. I have spent time at both venues. The addition to McCormick is nice, but was not really needed since there was already plenty of space to be had in the North and South halls and they were rarely filled to capacity as is. Plus it wiped out a lakefront view and a peek at Meigs Field at what used to be Lakeside Center (I believe). And if you asked show attendees what the big problem is with Chicago, they would tell you that just to set up a show booth it takes the involvement of several unions - carpeting, electrical, lighting, etc. Add to this very high hotel rates in Chicago and it costs big bucks to go and exhibit there.

Boston's convention center is a very nice venue, but this one is haunted by problems that are slightly different. If you ask people who have attended shows there, the number one complaint is high cab fares getting to and from hotels that are priced at or above Manhattan hotels. There are not a lot of hotels very close to this venue - and the ones that are close cost a fortune. The convention center is near the financial district, but does not have much dining or anything else within walking distance. I watched a trade show at this new center dwindle in three years to the point where the outfit that put the show on had to buy out the remaining two years of their contract just to protect the show from sliding into oblivion.

To dump millions into a new convention center in Queens is the height of idiocy. Firms coming to New York for a show want MANHATTAN and all of its glam and glitter; they do not want Queens (which is a dump). Plus, I believe they are already refurbishing the Jacob Javits Center (which is in Manhattan) so why do we need two of these behemoths? Anyone who stays at a hotel in Manhattan is already paying a "Javits tax." Do we need another one?

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.